- Home
- About
-
Staff
- Rusakovich Andrei Vladimirovich
- Rozanov Anatoliy Arkadievich
- Tihomirov Alexander Valentinovich
- Shadurski Victor Gennadievich
- Sidorchuk Valery Kirillovich
- Brovka Gennady Mikhailovich
- Gancherenok Igor Ivanovich
- Malevich Ulianna Igorevna
- Prannik Tatiana Alexandrovna
- Selivanov Andrey Vladimirovich
- Sharapo Alexander Victorovich
- Testimonials
-
Conference Proceedings
- Amber Coast Transport Initiative Project Concept
- Nato and Belarus - partnership, past tensions and future possibilities
- OSCE High-Level Seminar on Military Doctrine
- Poland-Belarus: perspectives of cross-border cooperation
- Polish-Belarussian Transborder Customs Cooperation: сurrent Problems and Challenges
-
Reports
- We see the significant reduction of the U.S. Army in Europe
- NATO's International Security Role
- International seminar on issues in the Collective Security Treaty Organization
- Belarus-Turkey: The ways of cooperation - 2011
- Belarus - Poland: two decades of international relations
- Belarus-Turkey: The ways of cooperation - 2009
- International seminar Belarusian Diaspora: Past and Present
- The first Round Table
-
News Releases
- The conference on Overcoming the financial crisis
- Round Table on history and future of Belarus-Poland cooperation
- Seminar on Belarusian diaspora: past and present
- The conference on Belarus in the Modern World
- The conference on Economic, legal and informational aspects of cooperation in customs sphere
- Comments
- Contact
The Belarusian side views the UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Belarus as groundless and politically motivated, Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrei Savinykh said when commenting the Resolution, BelTA has learned.
“Belarus strongly condemns the adoption of the UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Belarus as it is ungrounded and politically motivated. This document is a product of prevailing in Brussels ungrounded and politically committed evaluations of the situation in Belarus aimed at presenting our country as a particular case of the human rights violations,” Andrei Savinykh stressed.
According to him, the absence of support of the Resolution from the majority of UN Human Rights Council member states proves that the document is not a reflection the international community’s opinion regarding the situation in Belarus. Thus the Resolution cannot be viewed as a trustworthy document.
“We are convinced that this Resolution undermines the principle of non-selective treatment of human rights cases and will have devastating impact on the UN Human Rights Council and the UN Human Rights bodies in general,” the commentary says.
“Belarus fulfils and is going to fulfill its obligations in line with the international human rights documents. Belarus is in favor of an open, respectful and equal human rights dialogue without discrimination and double standards,” Andrei Savinykh added.